Thank you for your help, i think i will split the signal in two different 
analog inputs, one for the range of 0-10 A(for more accuracy) and the other 
one for 10-30 A with +/-0.1A.

On the other hand, aside the accuracy, i would like to implement the 
on-board filter to make simplier my Android app, i already have found on 
these forums how to change the sampling rate and reading the PIC's 
datasheet i found i could find the average value of 16 adc values with 
something like this:

for (count = 0; count < 16; count++) // average the 16 ADC value 
{ ADCValue = ADCValue + *ADC16Ptr++; } 
ADCValue = ADCValue >> 4;

But i'm struggling to know where to put that in the firmware code.

El jueves, 16 de julio de 2015, 11:43:15 (UTC-5), Ytai escribió:
>
> I don't see how sampling faster is going to improve your accuracy. The 
> +/-100mA that you're seeing is about you might expect of your current 
> signal properties and a 10-bit ADC, regardless of sampling rate. In other 
> words, if the problem you're trying to solve is that of increasing 
> precision, you're barking at the wrong tree.
> Of course, if you insist, you can fairly easily change the sampling rate 
> and/or introduce any on-board filtering you please.
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Julio Castellanos <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> For example if instead of sending all the values from the ADC, i 
>> calculate in the firmware the max value of the signal and send it 
>> periodically, i could increase the adc conversion rate and send the max at 
>> the same rate that now i'm sending the values, so my app would be faster 
>> because i wouldn't need to calculate anything, just multiply by 0.707 to 
>> get the rms value. It's just what i thought, please correct me if i'm wrong.
>>
>> El miércoles, 15 de julio de 2015, 16:57:00 (UTC-5), Ytai escribió:
>>>
>>> I don't see how custom firmware is going to give you higher precision. 
>>> The ADC on the PIC has 10-bit resolution, which translates into 3.3mV. With 
>>> your full-range scaling of 50mV/A this would translate into about 66mA 
>>> resolution. If that's insufficient you can either:
>>>
>>>    1. Use an external ADC with higher resolution.
>>>    2. Sacrifice your 30A range for higher precision in the low end by 
>>>    increasing the gain (be sure to clamp at 3.3V or else you'll be damaging 
>>>    the IOIO).
>>>    3. Dynamically change the gain under software control (e.g. by using 
>>>    a digital output to change a configuration resistor value on the op-amp).
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Julio Castellanos <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes indeed i need to conditionate the signal, i though there were pins 
>>>> tolerant to 5 V but i just read that is only for logic input. Until now i 
>>>> was measuring currents lower than 10 A so i didn't remarked the need of 
>>>> the 
>>>> conditioning. Thank you for your support.
>>>>
>>>> Also i was already using the buffered version of AnalogInput, i did 
>>>> just like you said, i measured the peak-to-peak voltage and converted it 
>>>> to 
>>>> rms, then i did a simple conversion to current, that's when i got the 
>>>> accuracy of +-0.1A, but i need it to be less than that, that's why i'm 
>>>> looking for the option of doing it in the firmware. I wonder if that is 
>>>> possible?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> El miércoles, 15 de julio de 2015, 12:09:16 (UTC-5), Ytai escribió:
>>>>>
>>>>> I think I understand now. So:
>>>>>
>>>>>    1. If you're really intending to measure a signal as high as 30A, 
>>>>>    the output voltage will be around 4.5V, which exceeds the range the 
>>>>> ADC is 
>>>>>    willing to accept (0-3.3V).
>>>>>    2. Unless the sensor has a built-in amplifier, it is likely that 
>>>>>    it has a fairly high output impedance.
>>>>>    3. To address both of the above problems, I recommend conditioning 
>>>>>    the signal using one of more opamp stages, so that it has about 1.5V 
>>>>> bias 
>>>>>    and about 1.5V amplitude @ 30A (or 50mV/A).
>>>>>    4. The IOIO samples at 1kHz. There should be no problem sampling 
>>>>>    of a 60Hz signal. Moreover, since you know it is a sine wave, all you 
>>>>>    really need is measure the peak-to-peak voltage which you can then 
>>>>>    trivially convert to RMS. I suggest that you look at the buffered 
>>>>> version 
>>>>>    of AnalogInput, so that you don't miss or depend on your application 
>>>>> thread 
>>>>>    loop frequency.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Julio Castellanos <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Ytai, thank you for your help. The signal is the output of an A.C. 
>>>>>> current sensor, the frequency is the same as the network, 60 hz, and the 
>>>>>> sensor can measure up to 30 A with a sensitivity of 66 mV/A. The signal 
>>>>>> has 
>>>>>> always a D.C. value of 2.5 V so if i measure 1 A the signal will have a 
>>>>>> max 
>>>>>> of 2.566 V and a min of  2.434 V. The absolute maximum with 30 A is 4.48 
>>>>>> V 
>>>>>> and absolute minimum of 0.52 V, so the signal is always in the range of 
>>>>>> the 
>>>>>> analog input of the ioio. I want to know the value rms of the current in 
>>>>>> my 
>>>>>> smartphone, and i tried obtaining the rms of the voltage by calculating 
>>>>>> the 
>>>>>> max value of a buffer of 1000 values and the multiplying it by 0.707. I 
>>>>>> get 
>>>>>> the value rms of the current with an accuracy of +-0.1 A, but i need it 
>>>>>> to 
>>>>>> be less than that, that's why i though it would be better to compute the 
>>>>>> rms value of the signal in hardware so i dont have to send the whole 
>>>>>> buffer 
>>>>>> of the signals.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> El martes, 14 de julio de 2015, 18:44:30 (UTC-5), Ytai escribió:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Before we begin, can you please specify the signal you're trying to 
>>>>>>> measure better?
>>>>>>> Specifically, its min and max (instantaneous) voltage, and its 
>>>>>>> bandwidth would be important.
>>>>>>> Based on that I can recommend a way of measuring it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Julio Castellanos <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello, i'm currently working with the IOIO analog input with a 
>>>>>>>> sensor signal that comes out as an A.C. signal in the range of 2,5 V 
>>>>>>>> as 
>>>>>>>> mean value. I've tried to get the voltage through the analog input and 
>>>>>>>> get 
>>>>>>>> the rms value in software, but the value changes to much because of 
>>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>>> bandwith limit of the IOIO:Android communication. I'm now looking to 
>>>>>>>> get 
>>>>>>>> the RMS directly in hardware and just send that value to the software 
>>>>>>>> but i 
>>>>>>>> gave a look at the hardware code for adc.c and i don't understand 
>>>>>>>> almost 
>>>>>>>> nothing, can someone point out to me a source where i can learn how 
>>>>>>>> does 
>>>>>>>> this code works?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>>>> Groups "ioio-users" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ioio-users.
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "ioio-users" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ioio-users.
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "ioio-users" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ioio-users.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "ioio-users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
>> <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ioio-users.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ioio-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ioio-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to