Thanks for comments, Ytai !
I understand your point in servo connection, but would it be possible to 
make a slight modification, that does not  increase the size of the board:
if the 3 pin rows of 3 and 5V are switched, and pin 45 is moved "up" to 
second row, it could be possible to connect easily 2 servos to 45,46 pins !
Of course this assumes that 5V can tolerate 2 servos.

tiistai 1. joulukuuta 2015 19.49.10 UTC+2 Ytai kirjoitti:
>
> Thanks for the feedback, I agree with most of it, see inline.
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:22 AM, <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
>> If I manage to desolve one of those components, is the IOIO board still 
>> functional, when powered (5V) using 5V pin ?
>> For me, powering the IOIO and servos has been the biggest problem. 
>> The main requirements are:
>> - IOIO could be powered using the standard 12V power adapter for "fixed" 
>> projects
>>
>
> Yes, this is possible. Up to 15V is supported. Due to a bug you're already 
> aware of the recommendation has been not to exceed 10V, but this bug is 
> believed to have been fixed and the new units are shipping soon from 
> SparkFun and SeeedStudio.
>  
>
>> - in "mobile" projects, using either Lipo (7.4V) or LifePo(6.6V) battery
>>
>
> Yes, this is possible.
>  
>
>> - it should be possible to SAFELY connect 3-4 servos to 5V connector in 
>> IOIO and run these servos concurrently. May be a place for an appropriate 
>> fuse should be added to limit the current and not damage the IOIO
>>
>
> The "3-4 servos" requirement is arbitrary. The next person is going to 
> require 8 servos, and you see where it goes... The IOIO have a 3A 
> regulator, which seemed to be a good trade-off between utility, cost and 
> board space. Whatever load fits in this budget, great! Whatever doesn't, 
> you can always use an external regulator. It is quite possible that you can 
> use 4 standard size servos within 3A. This would depend on the actual 
> servos, their gear ratio and the load. In either case, I agree that a 
> current overload should not permanently damage the board. This is believed 
> to be addressed by the new revision. One thing to ensure is that your 
> motors do not badly surge the voltage as result of sudden changes in 
> current. In case they do, proper protection is your responsibility (e.g. 
> large capacitors and shottky diodes).
>  
>
>> - another nice to have feature (even the physical size of IOIO board must 
>> be increased): in P-pins where PWM is possible, there could be ground and 
>> 5V pins, so that I can solve 3-pin male connector and connect the standard 
>> servo 3-pin female connector. This would make it easier to connect servos.
>>
>
> People have done that with "shields" etc. I don't see as servos being 
> special in any way and the trade-off would be increasing board size and 
> cost, which might have the next person complain about why the board is 
> bigger than necessary while they don't actually use it to drive servos. I 
> tried to keep the IOIO focused on being generic, with the assumption that 
> for application specific requirements, people can always implement shields 
> / mother-boards or spin their own version of the board, while using the 
> same software stack.
>  
>
>>
>> When will the new hardware revision available?
>>
>
> I cannot speak for the manufacturers. They might be waiting to finish 
> existing stocks before selling the new revision, etc. At least from my end, 
> I have gone through sufficient testing of the new revision from both main 
> manufacturers and am pleased with it. I know for certain that both are not 
> going to manufacture more of the old boards, so it is only a question of 
> when the next batch comes out.
>  
>
>> Can you consider these modifications, Ytai ?
>>
>
> I believe the new revision would meet most of your requirements as-is, 
> except for the servo-specific features, which I disagree with. Hope you 
> understand my reasoning.
>  
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> perjantai 13. marraskuuta 2015 22.36.54 UTC+2 Ytai kirjoitti:
>>>
>>> The switcher is the small square IC next to the power connector, which 
>>> has no legs. The inductor is the large-ish cylindrical component next to it.
>>> A new hardware revision of the IOIO will roll out very soon, which 
>>> addresses this issue. Until then, the advice is to not power the IOIO with 
>>> more than 10V.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 9:25 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have exactly the same problem in 2 of my IOIO boards. If it is 
>>>> powered using VIN->not working. If 5-5.5v supply is connected to 5v pin. 
>>>> The power led will be on, but not working, and the processor gets hot. The 
>>>> resistance between GND and 5V is nearly 0 (compared to functioning board 
>>>> 1-2 MOhm).
>>>> So what is the switcher to be eliminated to rescue the board ? The 
>>>> micro switch near USB connector ?
>>>>
>>>> perjantai 13. marraskuuta 2015 9.28.17 UTC+2 Ytai kirjoitti:
>>>>>
>>>>> It does sound like a fried switcher, causing a low impedance path 
>>>>> between 5V and ground. This is likely causing your 5V rail to sag, so it 
>>>>> might explain why your Android won't connect. One way to hack around this 
>>>>> problem is to desolder the switcher or the inductor. I would first verify 
>>>>> this guess by measuring resistance between 5V and GND when not powered, 
>>>>> and 
>>>>> expect that you'll see a low value in the few ohm or less range.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Zvonimir Udovičić <[email protected]
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dana četvrtak, 12. studenoga 2015. u 17:50:08 UTC+1, korisnik Tyler 
>>>>>> napisao je:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Okay, can you give us more detail? When you power the IOIO, are any 
>>>>>>> of the lights coming on? How are you powering the IOIO, specifically, 
>>>>>>> where 
>>>>>>> are you applying the 5v? Finally, does any part of the IOIO board feel 
>>>>>>> very 
>>>>>>> hot?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> power lamp  lights normally, i am powering ioio with 5V adapter on 
>>>>>> 5V pin, ioio board feels hot and vin pin is not working 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "ioio-users" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ioio-users.
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "ioio-users" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ioio-users.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "ioio-users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
>> <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ioio-users.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ioio-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ioio-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to