On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 03:05:49PM +0100, Sean wrote: >On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 12:32 +0100, Luis Oliveira wrote: >> I plan to work on cleaning cffi-grovel up, document it and integrate it >> with CFFI (as a separate ASDF system) as part of my Summer of Code >> project[1]. Now's a great time to let me know of any problems you'd >> like to see fixed or features you'd like to see added! > >I have a few patches which may be useful. >The first is Lispworks support , the second is allowing >a default keyword value for constants (which is quote possibly the wrong >thing) and the third is support for windows (using the dmc[1] compiler). >Please give me a shout if you are interested in any of these patches and >I'll cobble together a diff or 3. wonderful :) , just try to send one feature per patch, one patch per email so that they can be discussed separately
>As far as features go number one would be the ability to specify a
>default generated lisp file if, for example, the specified compiler is
>not available or compilation fails (which given that most people don't
>have many headers available on Windows system could be quite useful).
I don't understand, what do you accomplish this way ?
--
(sign :name "Stelian Ionescu" :aka "fe[nl]ix"
:quote "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.")
pgpimpaxDq4D4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ iolib-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/iolib-devel
