On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 18:47 -0500, Matthew Mondor wrote: > I decided to upgrade from 20090124 snapshot to 0.6.0 release today, and > noticed the netbsd fixes I proposed were checked in, so tried using it, > yet there would be a "NO-OP" build error of some kind, which wouldn't > occur if I re-evaluated the require form at repl, but then an assertion > failure would occur in SB-C about a SIGNED-32 type. > > I looked again at the source and noticed the fix for netbsd wasn't > applied the same as I had applied it on my tree. I had kept :pointer > for the udata kevent structure rather than :intptr_t. I thus tried the > same on 0.6.0 and it works fine.
Ok, I changed this back. Could you post a backtrace, btw ? -- Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ IOLib-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/iolib-devel
