On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 03:16 -0500, Matthew Mondor wrote: > Hi again and thanks for commiting the diffs, > > Will official releases still have the asd files at the top level like > other asdf packages?
Yes - for personal æesthetic reasons: I want the top directory do be uncluttered > A script adding all the first level package directories to > asdf:*central-registry* can no longer work with iolib >0.6.0 unless it > also locates asd files or unless I "mv src/* ." for instance. I don't like very much the use of a script to automatically add directories to asdf:*central-registry* . In case of your development machine you're much better off with using a single directory + symlinks, and in case of automatic deployment I think that keeping an explicit MANIFEST file containing the path of all enabled .asd files is much better. -- Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ IOLib-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/iolib-devel
