On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 20:15 -0600, Peter Keller wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a means by which a handler registered with set-io-handler can be > "deactivated" so that it isn't considered in the fd set being checked and > "reactivated" later to be put back into the fd set? I ask because I might not > have access to the function which I want associated, say with a write handler, > but when the buffer the write handler is writing is empty. If the write > handler is always activated on an empty buffer solely because it is in the > write handler callback, then that is a performance problem.
Currently there's no way to do that -- Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. http://common-lisp.net/project/iolib
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ IOLib-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/iolib-devel
