On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:57:58AM -0400, Don Dutile wrote:
> And you can't apply Alex's original patch as-is, since the iommu_bmp
> structure element changed from a ptr to an array,
> (a snippet of) alex's patch looked like:
> +    i = find_first_bit(&domain->iommu_bmp, g_num_of_iommus);
> 
> and the correct patch with the change to iommu_bmp is:
> +    i = find_first_bit(domain->iommu_bmp, g_num_of_iommus);
> 
> and the reason why I re-posted it, vs fwd-ing the original patch
> & asking for inclusion.
> Additionally, the above patch is what the customer tested & verified.
> 
> So, if you made the above adjustment to Alex's patch,
> then the patch is ok.  If not, the above adjustment must be made.

Okay, fine then. I made the adjustment to Alex' patch and will push my
updated tree out after some compile-testing.


        Joerg

-- 
AMD Operating System Research Center

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach
General Managers: Alberto Bozzo
Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to