On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:36:13PM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote: > This should ensure that arm-smmu is initialized before other drivers > start handling devices that propably need smmu support. > > Also remove module_exit function as we most likely never want to > unload this driver.
Doesn't hurt to leave the exit function there though, right? > Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 8 +------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c > index 181c9ba..6808577 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c > @@ -1976,13 +1976,7 @@ static int __init arm_smmu_init(void) > return 0; > } > > -static void __exit arm_smmu_exit(void) > -{ > - return platform_driver_unregister(&arm_smmu_driver); > -} > - > -module_init(arm_smmu_init); > -module_exit(arm_smmu_exit); > +arch_initcall(arm_smmu_init); Why not subsys_initcall, like the other ARM IOMMUs? Will _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
