On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Hiroshi Doyu <hd...@nvidia.com> wrote:
> Grant Likely <grant.lik...@linaro.org> wrote @ Thu, 21 Nov 2013 16:56:49 
> +0100:
>
>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:12:18 +0200, Hiroshi Doyu <hd...@nvidia.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 13:43:28 +0100
>> > Grant Likely <grant.lik...@linaro.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:33:05 +0200, Hiroshi Doyu <hd...@nvidia.com> 
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > The following pattern of code is tempting:
>> > > >
>> > > >   for (i = 0; !of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, list, cells, i, args); 
>> > > > i++)
>> > > >
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <hd...@nvidia.com>
>> > >
>> > > That's a very minimal commit message. Can you elaborate please.
>> >
>> > The above can be:
>> >
>> > "
>> >   The following pattern of code is tempting to add a new member for
>> >   of_property_for_each_*() family as an idiom.
>> >
>> >     for (i = 0;
>> >         !of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, list, cells, i, args); i++)
>> >                   <do something with "args">;
>> > "
>>
>> I really do like commit messages to be full enough that a future reader
>> can figure out why a patch was written. ie:
>
> Updated as:
>
>   [PATCHv6+ 01/13] of: introduce of_property_for_earch_phandle_with_args()

You also have a typo in the subject.

s/earch/each/

Rob
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to