Hello,
On 2014-08-25 23:18, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:47:32PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
+ if (failed && dev->bus)
+ blocking_notifier_call_chain(&dev->bus->p->bus_notifier,
+ BUS_NOTIFY_DRVBIND_FAILED, dev);
+
Why can't you just use the notifier for BUS_NOTIFY_UNBIND_DRIVER or
BUS_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER when something goes wrong in driver
initialization?
Hmmm, you might be right. BUS_NOTIFY_UNBIND_DRIVER event happens before
unbinding
the driver, but BUS_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER is called when driver remove
has been
finished, so it can be considered as a symmetrical pair for
BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER.
Driver which registered bus notifiers is mainly interested in doing
right cleanup,
so the code executed for IOMMU_GROUP_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER and
IOMMU_GROUP_NOTIFY_DRVBIND_FAILED is same.
I will remove this additional event and simply add a call to
BUS_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER event when driver probe fails.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
