On Monday 22 September 2014 11:19:35 Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 05:34:55PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> [...]
>
> > +static bool arm_setup_iommu_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64
> > size) +{
> > + struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping;
> > +
> > + mapping = arm_iommu_create_mapping(dev->bus, dma_base, size);
>
> If I understand correctly this will be called for each device that has
> an IOMMU master interface and will end up creating a new mapping for
> each of the devices. Each of these mappings will translate to a domain
> in the IOMMU API, which in turn is a separate address space.
>
> How do you envision to support use-cases where a set of devices need to
> share a single domain? This is needed for example in DRM where SoCs
> often have a set of hardware blocks (each with its own master interface)
> that compose the display device. On Tegra for example there are two
> display controllers that need access to the same IOVA domain so that
> they can scan out framebuffers.Or simply for IOMMUs that serve multiple masters and support a single domain only. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ iommu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
