On 2014/9/25 15:19, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:14:13AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
>> Currently, pcie-designware, pcie-rcar, pci-tegra drivers
>> use irq chip_data to save the msi_chip pointer. They
>> already call irq_set_chip_data() in their own MSI irq map
>> functions. So irq_set_chip_data() in arch_setup_msi_irq()
>> is useless.
>
> Again, I think this should be the other way around. If drivers do
> something that's already handled by the core, then the duplicate code
> should be dropped from the drivers.
Hi Thierry, this is different thing, because chip_data is specific to IRQ
controller, and in other platform, like in x86, chip_data is used to save
irq_cfg.
So we can not call irq_set_chip_data() in core code.
x86 irq piece code
int arch_setup_hwirq(unsigned int irq, int node)
{
struct irq_cfg *cfg;
unsigned long flags;
int ret;
cfg = alloc_irq_cfg(irq, node);
if (!cfg)
return -ENOMEM;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vector_lock, flags);
ret = __assign_irq_vector(irq, cfg, apic->target_cpus());
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vector_lock, flags);
if (!ret)
irq_set_chip_data(irq, cfg); ------------->Save irq_cfg
else
free_irq_cfg(irq, cfg);
return ret;
}
Thanks!
Yijing.
>
> Thierry
>
--
Thanks!
Yijing
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
