Hi Laurent, On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Geert, > > On Monday 15 December 2014 14:07:52 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> > Add the seven IPMMU instances found in the r8a7791 to DT with a disabled >> > status. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart >> > <[email protected]> >> >> The addresses and interrupt numbers look OK to me. >> However, my comment about the "0x800" offset is still valid. >> Shouldn't we have two register blocks, and let the driver use only the >> second one? >> >> If you ignore, feel free to add my >> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> > > I don't want to ignore your comment, but I don't know what to do here :-/ The > datasheet lacks detailed information about secure vs. non-secure mode and how > the two register sets are supposed to interoperate and be handled by the > operating system.
I don't know about that either. But how about differences within R-Car Gen2 series so far? If there are known differences then perhaps we should use part number in the compatible string? Thanks, / magnus _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
