On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 10:19:05AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc Dave for sparc64, Yinghai]
> 
> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 01:32:15PM -0500, [email protected] wrote:
> > From: Will Davis <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Simply route these through to the new dma_(un)map_resource APIs.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Will Davis <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Terence Ripperda <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  include/asm-generic/pci-dma-compat.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/pci-dma-compat.h 
> > b/include/asm-generic/pci-dma-compat.h
> > index c110843..ac4a4ad 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/pci-dma-compat.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/pci-dma-compat.h
> > @@ -61,6 +61,20 @@ pci_unmap_page(struct pci_dev *hwdev, dma_addr_t 
> > dma_address,
> >     dma_unmap_page(hwdev == NULL ? NULL : &hwdev->dev, dma_address, size, 
> > (enum dma_data_direction)direction);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline dma_addr_t
> > +pci_map_resource(struct pci_dev *hwdev, struct resource *resource,
> > +            unsigned long offset, size_t size, int direction)
> > +{
> > +   return dma_map_resource(hwdev == NULL ? NULL : &hwdev->dev, resource, 
> > offset, size, (enum dma_data_direction)direction);
> > +}
> 
> On sparc64, PCI bus addresses, e.g., raw BAR values, can be 64 bits wide,
> but dma_addr_t is only 32 bits [1].  So dma_addr_t is a bit of a problem
> here.  It's likely that we will add a pci_bus_addr_t, but that hasn't
> happened yet [2].

Why not just expand the 'dma_addr_t' to be unsigned long (if to support
the T5-8 box)?
> 
> We do have existing problems already, e.g,. pci_bus_address() returns a
> dma_addr_t, so it has the same problem.  So I guess this is just a heads-up
> that this needs to be fixed eventually.
> 
> Bjorn
> 
> [1] 
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> [2] 
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> _______________________________________________
> iommu mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to