On 18/12/15 08:09, Yong Wu wrote:
This patch adds support for mediatek m4u (MultiMedia Memory Management
Unit).
Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong...@mediatek.com>
---
drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 14 +
drivers/iommu/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 734 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 749 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d000d31
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
[...]
+#define REG_MMU_CTRL_REG 0x110
+#define F_MMU_PREFETCH_RT_REPLACE_MOD BIT(4)
+#define F_MMU_TF_PROTECT_SEL(prot) (((prot) & 0x3) << 5)
+#define F_COHERENCE_EN BIT(8)
[...]
+static int mtk_iommu_hw_init(const struct mtk_iommu_data *data)
+{
+ u32 regval;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = clk_prepare_enable(data->bclk);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(data->dev, "Failed to enable iommu bclk(%d)\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ regval = F_MMU_PREFETCH_RT_REPLACE_MOD |
+ F_MMU_TF_PROTECT_SEL(2) |
+ F_COHERENCE_EN;
I meant to ask this last time - does setting F_COHERENCE_EN here imply
that the M4U is capable of cache-coherent page table walks, or something
else? If it's the former, and assuming the MT8173 is actually wired up
to support that, then you should add a dma-coherent property to its DT
node in patch 5 (which will also save you all the cache flushes on page
table updates).
+ writel_relaxed(regval, data->base + REG_MMU_CTRL_REG);
+
+ regval = F_L2_MULIT_HIT_EN |
+ F_TABLE_WALK_FAULT_INT_EN |
+ F_PREETCH_FIFO_OVERFLOW_INT_EN |
+ F_MISS_FIFO_OVERFLOW_INT_EN |
+ F_PREFETCH_FIFO_ERR_INT_EN |
+ F_MISS_FIFO_ERR_INT_EN;
+ writel_relaxed(regval, data->base + REG_MMU_INT_CONTROL0);
+
+ regval = F_INT_TRANSLATION_FAULT |
+ F_INT_MAIN_MULTI_HIT_FAULT |
+ F_INT_INVALID_PA_FAULT |
+ F_INT_ENTRY_REPLACEMENT_FAULT |
+ F_INT_TLB_MISS_FAULT |
+ F_INT_MISS_TRANSATION_FIFO_FAULT |
+ F_INT_PRETETCH_TRANSATION_FIFO_FAULT;
+ writel_relaxed(regval, data->base + REG_MMU_INT_MAIN_CONTROL);
+
+ regval = F_MMU_IVRP_PA_SET(data->protect_base);
+ writel_relaxed(regval, data->base + REG_MMU_IVRP_PADDR);
+
+ writel_relaxed(0, data->base + REG_MMU_DCM_DIS);
+ writel_relaxed(0, data->base + REG_MMU_STANDARD_AXI_MODE);
+
+ if (devm_request_irq(data->dev, data->irq, mtk_iommu_isr, 0,
+ dev_name(data->dev), (void *)data)) {
+ writel_relaxed(0, data->base + REG_MMU_PT_BASE_ADDR);
+ clk_disable_unprepare(data->bclk);
+ dev_err(data->dev, "Failed @ IRQ-%d Request\n", data->irq);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
Otherwise, I've not had the chance to go through this thoroughly but at
a glance it seems in pretty good shape now - nothing immediately jumps
out as looking wrong or worth making a fuss over.
Thanks,
Robin.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
