On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 07:37:59PM -0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> I don't know you already posted one. Roughly looked at the patches. We
> are using exactly the same idea. I'm happy we pursue your patches. At
> the first look, the per-cpu allocation in your patch doesn't check
> pfn_limit, that could be wrong, but should be easy to fix. I'll take a
> close look tomorrow.

Sounds great. Your approaches with the per-cpu are pretty similar, so I
would appreciate if you two come up with a combined patch-set?


        Joerg

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to