On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Magnus Damm <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Magnus Damm <[email protected]>
>
> Right now the ->xlate() call gets invoked even though
> the iommu device has status = "disabled" in DT, so
> make sure we skip over disabled devices.
>
> In my mind it would make sense to have this at some
> shared level, but I guess some users may want to
> configure the iommu regardless of DT state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- 0017/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> +++ work/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c 2016-03-18 00:16:51.200513000 +0900
> @@ -890,7 +890,13 @@ static struct iommu_group *ipmmu_device_
> static int ipmmu_of_xlate_dma(struct device *dev,
> struct of_phandle_args *spec)
> {
> - /* dummy callback to satisfy of_iommu_configure() */
> + /* If the IPMMU device is disabled in DT then return error
> + * to make sure the of_iommu code does not install ops
> + * even though the iommu device is disabled
> + */
> + if (!of_device_is_available(spec->np))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> return 0;
I think this should be handled in drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c:of_iommu_init()
instead, cfr. commit 3e5dd6f6e690048d ("clk: Ignore disabled DT clock
providers").
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
