On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 06:15:36PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > If an IOMMU node is present in the DT but marked as disabled, we should > avoid trying to do anything with it. We currently sort-of get away with > this by virtue of a disabled device probably not having called > of_iommu_set_ops(), but that is hardly safe to rely upon in general, and > either way we don't want to treat it as an error condition with the > resulting "Failed to initialise IOMMU" message.
What's the use-case for this? I ask because epapr says that the device binding should provide details as to exactly what "disabled" means for that device. Will _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
