From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>

Make the device suspend/resume part of the core system
suspend/resume code use device links to ensure that supplier
and consumer devices will be suspended and resumed in the right
order in case of async suspend/resume.

The idea, roughly, is to use dpm_wait() to wait for all consumers
before a supplier device suspend and to wait for all suppliers
before a consumer device resume.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprow...@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/base/base.h       |  2 ++
 drivers/base/core.c       |  4 +--
 drivers/base/power/main.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/base.h b/drivers/base/base.h
index cccb1d211541..123b986eb061 100644
--- a/drivers/base/base.h
+++ b/drivers/base/base.h
@@ -163,3 +163,5 @@ extern void device_links_driver_gone(struct device *dev);
 extern void device_links_no_driver(struct device *dev);
 extern bool device_links_busy(struct device *dev);
 extern void device_links_unbind_consumers(struct device *dev);
+extern int device_links_read_lock(void);
+extern void device_links_read_unlock(int idx);
diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
index 416341df3268..51a479ed68b5 100644
--- a/drivers/base/core.c
+++ b/drivers/base/core.c
@@ -163,12 +163,12 @@ void device_link_del(struct devlink *link)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_link_del);
 
-static int device_links_read_lock(void)
+int device_links_read_lock(void)
 {
        return srcu_read_lock(&device_links_srcu);
 }
 
-static void device_links_read_unlock(int idx)
+void device_links_read_unlock(int idx)
 {
        return srcu_read_unlock(&device_links_srcu, idx);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
index e44944f4be77..9470ccd87f11 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
@@ -244,6 +244,62 @@ static void dpm_wait_for_children(struct device *dev, bool 
async)
        device_for_each_child(dev, &async, dpm_wait_fn);
 }
 
+static void dpm_wait_for_suppliers(struct device *dev, bool async)
+{
+       struct devlink *link;
+       int idx;
+
+       idx = device_links_read_lock();
+
+       /*
+        * If the supplier goes away right after we've checked the link to it,
+        * we'll wait for its completion to change the state, but that's fine,
+        * because the only things that will block as a result are the SRCU
+        * callbacks freeing the link objects for the links in the list we're
+        * walking.
+        */
+       list_for_each_entry_rcu(link, &dev->consumer_links, c_node)
+               if (link->status != DEVICE_LINK_DORMANT)
+                       dpm_wait(link->supplier, async);
+
+       device_links_read_unlock(idx);
+}
+
+static void dpm_wait_for_superior(struct device *dev, bool async)
+{
+       dpm_wait(dev->parent, async);
+       dpm_wait_for_suppliers(dev, async);
+}
+
+static void dpm_wait_for_consumers(struct device *dev, bool async)
+{
+       struct devlink *link;
+       int idx;
+
+       idx = device_links_read_lock();
+
+       /*
+        * The status of a device link can only be changed from "dormant" by a
+        * probe, but that cannot happen during system suspend/resume.  In
+        * theory it can change to "dormant" at that time, but then it is
+        * reasonable to wait for the target device anyway (eg. if it goes
+        * away, it's better to wait for it to go away completely and then
+        * continue instead of trying to continue in parallel with its
+        * unregistration).
+        */
+       list_for_each_entry_rcu(link, &dev->supplier_links, s_node)
+               if (link->status != DEVICE_LINK_DORMANT)
+                       dpm_wait(link->consumer, async);
+
+       device_links_read_unlock(idx);
+}
+
+static void dpm_wait_for_subordinate(struct device *dev, bool async)
+{
+       dpm_wait_for_children(dev, async);
+       dpm_wait_for_consumers(dev, async);
+}
+
 /**
  * pm_op - Return the PM operation appropriate for given PM event.
  * @ops: PM operations to choose from.
@@ -488,7 +544,7 @@ static int device_resume_noirq(struct device *dev, 
pm_message_t state, bool asyn
        if (!dev->power.is_noirq_suspended)
                goto Out;
 
-       dpm_wait(dev->parent, async);
+       dpm_wait_for_superior(dev, async);
 
        if (dev->pm_domain) {
                info = "noirq power domain ";
@@ -618,7 +674,7 @@ static int device_resume_early(struct device *dev, 
pm_message_t state, bool asyn
        if (!dev->power.is_late_suspended)
                goto Out;
 
-       dpm_wait(dev->parent, async);
+       dpm_wait_for_superior(dev, async);
 
        if (dev->pm_domain) {
                info = "early power domain ";
@@ -750,7 +806,7 @@ static int device_resume(struct device *dev, pm_message_t 
state, bool async)
                goto Complete;
        }
 
-       dpm_wait(dev->parent, async);
+       dpm_wait_for_superior(dev, async);
        dpm_watchdog_set(&wd, dev);
        device_lock(dev);
 
@@ -1038,7 +1094,7 @@ static int __device_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev, 
pm_message_t state, bool a
        if (dev->power.syscore || dev->power.direct_complete)
                goto Complete;
 
-       dpm_wait_for_children(dev, async);
+       dpm_wait_for_subordinate(dev, async);
 
        if (dev->pm_domain) {
                info = "noirq power domain ";
@@ -1185,7 +1241,7 @@ static int __device_suspend_late(struct device *dev, 
pm_message_t state, bool as
        if (dev->power.syscore || dev->power.direct_complete)
                goto Complete;
 
-       dpm_wait_for_children(dev, async);
+       dpm_wait_for_subordinate(dev, async);
 
        if (dev->pm_domain) {
                info = "late power domain ";
@@ -1358,7 +1414,7 @@ static int __device_suspend(struct device *dev, 
pm_message_t state, bool async)
        TRACE_DEVICE(dev);
        TRACE_SUSPEND(0);
 
-       dpm_wait_for_children(dev, async);
+       dpm_wait_for_subordinate(dev, async);
 
        if (async_error)
                goto Complete;
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to