Hi Thomas,
On 19/07/2016 16:22, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Eric Auger wrote:
>> +
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/irq.h>
>> +#include <linux/msi-doorbell.h>
>> +
>> +struct irqchip_doorbell {
>> + struct irq_chip_msi_doorbell_info info;
>> + struct list_head next;
>
> Again, please align the struct members.
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +static LIST_HEAD(irqchip_doorbell_list);
>> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(irqchip_doorbell_mutex);
>> +
>> +struct irq_chip_msi_doorbell_info *
>> +msi_doorbell_register_global(phys_addr_t base, size_t size,
>> + int prot, bool irq_remapping)
>> +{
>> + struct irqchip_doorbell *db;
>> +
>> + db = kmalloc(sizeof(*db), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!db)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> +
>> + db->info.doorbell_is_percpu = false;
>
> Please use kzalloc and get rid of zero initialization. If you add stuff to the
> struct then initialization will be automatically 0.
OK
>
>> +void msi_doorbell_unregister_global(struct irq_chip_msi_doorbell_info
>> *dbinfo)
>> +{
>> + struct irqchip_doorbell *db, *tmp;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&irqchip_doorbell_mutex);
>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(db, tmp, &irqchip_doorbell_list, next) {
>
> Why do you need that iterator?
>
> db = container_of(dbinfo, struct ....., info);
>
> Hmm?
definitively
>
>> + if (dbinfo == &db->info) {
>> + list_del(&db->next);
>> + kfree(db);
>
> Please move the kfree() outside of the lock region. It does not matter much
> here, but we really should stop doing random crap in locked regions.
OK
Thanks
Eric
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
