On 09/09/16 15:23, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> In ARM ACPI systems, IOMMU components are specified through static
> IORT table entries. In order to create platform devices for the
> corresponding ARM SMMU components, IORT kernel code should be made
> able to parse IORT table entries and create platform devices
> dynamically.
> 
> This patch adds the generic IORT infrastructure required to create
> platform devices for ARM SMMUs.
> 
> ARM SMMU versions have different resources requirement therefore this
> patch also introduces an IORT specific structure (ie iort_iommu_config)
> that contains hooks (to be defined when the corresponding ARM SMMU
> driver support is added to the kernel) to be used to define the
> platform devices names, init the IOMMUs, count their resources and
> finally initialize them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieral...@arm.com>
> Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun....@linaro.org>
> Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <t...@semihalf.com>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <r...@rjwysocki.net>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 131 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 131 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> index b89b3d3..e0a9b16 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/list.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  
>  struct iort_its_msi_chip {
> @@ -424,6 +425,135 @@ struct irq_domain *iort_get_device_domain(struct device 
> *dev, u32 req_id)
>       return irq_find_matching_fwnode(handle, DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI);
>  }
>  
> +struct iort_iommu_config {
> +     const char *name;
> +     int (*iommu_init)(struct acpi_iort_node *node);
> +     bool (*iommu_is_coherent)(struct acpi_iort_node *node);
> +     int (*iommu_count_resources)(struct acpi_iort_node *node);
> +     void (*iommu_init_resources)(struct resource *res,
> +                                  struct acpi_iort_node *node);
> +};
> +
> +static __init
> +const struct iort_iommu_config *iort_get_iommu_cfg(struct acpi_iort_node 
> *node)
> +{
> +     return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * iort_add_smmu_platform_device() - Allocate a platform device for SMMU
> + * @fwnode: IORT node associated fwnode handle
> + * @node: Pointer to SMMU ACPI IORT node
> + *
> + * Returns: 0 on success, <0 failure
> + */
> +static int __init iort_add_smmu_platform_device(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> +                                             struct acpi_iort_node *node)
> +{
> +     struct platform_device *pdev;
> +     struct resource *r;
> +     enum dev_dma_attr attr;
> +     int ret, count;
> +     const struct iort_iommu_config *ops = iort_get_iommu_cfg(node);
> +
> +     if (!ops)
> +             return -ENODEV;
> +
> +     pdev = platform_device_alloc(ops->name, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO);
> +     if (!pdev)
> +             return PTR_ERR(pdev);
> +
> +     count = ops->iommu_count_resources(node);
> +
> +     r = kcalloc(count, sizeof(*r), GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (!r) {
> +             ret = -ENOMEM;
> +             goto dev_put;
> +     }
> +
> +     ops->iommu_init_resources(r, node);
> +
> +     ret = platform_device_add_resources(pdev, r, count);
> +     /*
> +      * Resources are duplicated in platform_device_add_resources,
> +      * free their allocated memory
> +      */
> +     kfree(r);
> +
> +     if (ret)
> +             goto dev_put;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Add a copy of IORT node pointer to platform_data to
> +      * be used to retrieve IORT data information.
> +      */
> +     ret = platform_device_add_data(pdev, &node, sizeof(node));
> +     if (ret)
> +             goto dev_put;
> +
> +     pdev->dev.dma_mask = kmalloc(sizeof(*pdev->dev.dma_mask), GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (!pdev->dev.dma_mask) {
> +             ret = -ENOMEM;
> +             goto dev_put;
> +     }

Since this is exclusively for creating SMMUs, and we know they should
never have weird shenanigans going on requiring different masks, I'd be
inclined to just point dev.dma_mask at dev.coherent_dma_mask and be done
with it.

> +
> +     pdev->dev.fwnode = fwnode;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * Set default dma mask value for the table walker,
> +      * to be overridden on probing with correct value.
> +      */
> +     *pdev->dev.dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
> +     pdev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = *pdev->dev.dma_mask;
> +
> +     attr = ops->iommu_is_coherent(node) ?
> +                          DEV_DMA_COHERENT : DEV_DMA_NON_COHERENT;
> +
> +     /* Configure DMA for the page table walker */
> +     acpi_dma_configure(&pdev->dev, attr);

Oh look, some more code which would be simpler if acpi_dma_configure()
set the default mask itself ;)

Robin.

> +
> +     ret = platform_device_add(pdev);
> +     if (ret)
> +             goto dma_deconfigure;
> +
> +     return 0;
> +
> +dma_deconfigure:
> +     acpi_dma_deconfigure(&pdev->dev);
> +     kfree(pdev->dev.dma_mask);
> +
> +dev_put:
> +     platform_device_put(pdev);
> +
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static acpi_status __init iort_match_iommu_callback(struct acpi_iort_node 
> *node,
> +                                                 void *context)
> +{
> +     int ret;
> +     struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
> +
> +     fwnode = iort_get_fwnode(node);
> +
> +     if (!fwnode)
> +             return AE_NOT_FOUND;
> +
> +     ret = iort_add_smmu_platform_device(fwnode, node);
> +     if (ret) {
> +             pr_err("Error in platform device creation\n");
> +             return AE_ERROR;
> +     }
> +
> +     return AE_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static void __init iort_smmu_init(void)
> +{
> +     iort_scan_node(ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU, iort_match_iommu_callback, NULL);
> +     iort_scan_node(ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU_V3, iort_match_iommu_callback, NULL);
> +}
> +
>  void __init acpi_iort_init(void)
>  {
>       acpi_status status;
> @@ -436,4 +566,5 @@ void __init acpi_iort_init(void)
>       }
>  
>       acpi_probe_device_table(iort);
> +     iort_smmu_init();
>  }
> 

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to