Peter,

On 1/23/17 19:33, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 01:23:30AM -0600, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
 static void perf_iommu_read(struct perf_event *event)
 {
-       u64 count = 0ULL;
-       u64 prev_raw_count = 0ULL;
-       u64 delta = 0ULL;
+       u64 count, prev;
+       s64 delta;

I did send that email where I told I was mistaken with that suggestion,
right? Since the counter always increments (it does, right), a negative
delta does not make sense.

Right, I sent this out before your reply email in V7. I'll change the delta
back to u64. I'll fix this in V9.


        struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;

        amd_iommu_pc_get_set_reg_val(_GET_DEVID(event),
@@ -330,18 +329,20 @@ static void perf_iommu_read(struct perf_event *event)
                                IOMMU_PC_COUNTER_REG, &count, false);

        /* IOMMU pc counter register is only 48 bits */
-       count &= 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFULL;
+       count &= GENMASK_ULL(48, 0);

Why do you need that at all? If the counter is only 48 bits, what does
the hardware do with the upper bits?

So, bit 48-63 are reserved. I just try to ensure that the HW does not use them
for anything (also probably in the future).


-       prev_raw_count =  local64_read(&hwc->prev_count);
-       if (local64_cmpxchg(&hwc->prev_count, prev_raw_count,
-                                       count) != prev_raw_count)
-               return;
+       prev = local64_read(&hwc->prev_count);

I'm still not convinced you can do away with that cmpxchg.

Ok, I can just leave the local64_read() in.

Thanks,
Suravee
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to