Hi Robin, On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Robin Murphy <robin.mur...@arm.com> wrote: > On 07/03/17 03:17, Magnus Damm wrote: >> From: Magnus Damm <damm+rene...@opensource.se> >> >> Not all architectures have an iommu member in their archdata, so >> use #ifdefs support build with COMPILE_TEST on any architecture. > > I have a feeling I might be repeating myself, but ipmmu_vmsa_archdata > looks to be trivially convertible to iommu_fwspec, which I strongly > encourage, not least because it would obviate bodges like this.
Yeah, I think it should be possible to use iommu_fwspec for this purpose. The question is when to do it. =) I actually looked into it recently, but then realised that for this to work then due to code sharing I need to make use of iommu_fwspec on both 32-bit and 64-bit ARM. So it requires rework of the existing IPMMU for 32-bit ARM (including hairy legacy CONFIG_IOMMU_DMA=n code). I was actually thinking of doing some rework of 32-bit ARM IPMMU code anyway (I suspect iommu_device_* conversion caused breakage) and it probably has to happen on top of current -next. I would also like to start reducing burden of forward porting all these patches, and stirring up the ground does not really help much there... Cheers, / magnus _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
