Hi Sricharan,
Thank you for the patch.
On Thursday 18 May 2017 15:37:08 Sricharan R wrote:
> Now with IOMMU probe deferral, we return -EPROBE_DEFER
> for masters that are connected to an IOMMU which is not
> probed yet, but going to get probed, so that we can attach
> the correct dma_ops. So while trying to defer the probe of
> the master, check if the of_iommu node that it is connected
> to is marked in DT as 'status=disabled', then the IOMMU is never
> is going to get probed. So simply return NULL and let the master
> work without an IOMMU.
>
> Fixes: 7b07cbefb68d ("iommu: of: Handle IOMMU lookup failure with deferred
> probing or error") Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricha...@codeaurora.org>
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <ge...@linux-m68k.org>
> Tested-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Magnus Damn <magnus.d...@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> [V2] Corrected spelling/case in commit log
>
> drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> index 9f44ee8..e6e9bec 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ static bool of_iommu_driver_present(struct device_node
> *np)
>
> ops = iommu_ops_from_fwnode(fwnode);
> if ((ops && !ops->of_xlate) ||
> + !of_device_is_available(iommu_spec->np) ||
> (!ops && !of_iommu_driver_present(iommu_spec->np)))
> return NULL;
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
