Hi Robin, On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 02:44:24PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > Since Nate reported a reasonable performance boost from the out-of-line > MSI polling in v1 [1], I've now implemented the equivalent for cons > polling as well - that has been boot-tested on D05 with some trivial I/O > and at least doesn't seem to lock up or explode. There's also a little > cosmetic tweaking to make the patches a bit cleaner as a series. > > Robin. > > [1] > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg19657.html > > Robin Murphy (5): > iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Specialise CMD_SYNC handling > iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Forget about cmdq-sync interrupt > iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use CMD_SYNC completion interrupt > iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Poll for CMD_SYNC outside cmdq lock > iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use burst-polling for sync completion
What's this final mythical patch about? I don't see it in the series. Anyway, the first two patches look fine to me, but this doesn't apply on top of my iommu/devel branch so they will need rebasing. Cheers, Will _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
