While CMD_SYNC is unlikely to complete immediately such that we never go round the polling loop, with a lightly-loaded queue it may still do so long before the delay period is up. If we have no better completion notifier, use similar logic as we have for SMMUv2 to spin a number of times before each backoff, so that we have more chance of catching syncs which complete relatively quickly and avoid delaying unnecessarily.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]> --- I still have no idea whether this patch has any real merit or not. drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c index 3130e7182dde..994b3a38f222 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c @@ -418,6 +418,7 @@ /* High-level queue structures */ #define ARM_SMMU_POLL_TIMEOUT_US 100 #define ARM_SMMU_SYNC_TIMEOUT_US 1000000 /* 1s! */ +#define ARM_SMMU_SYNC_SPIN_COUNT 10 #define MSI_IOVA_BASE 0x8000000 #define MSI_IOVA_LENGTH 0x100000 @@ -1013,7 +1014,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_sync_poll_cons(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sync_idx, ktime_t timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), ARM_SMMU_SYNC_TIMEOUT_US); struct arm_smmu_queue *q = &smmu->cmdq.q; bool wfe = !!(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_SEV); - unsigned int delay = 1; + unsigned int delay = 1, spin_cnt = 0; do { queue_sync_cons(q); @@ -1036,10 +1037,13 @@ static int arm_smmu_sync_poll_cons(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sync_idx, if (wfe) { wfe(); - } else { + } else if (++spin_cnt < ARM_SMMU_SYNC_SPIN_COUNT) { cpu_relax(); + continue; + } else { udelay(delay); delay *= 2; + spin_cnt = 0; } } while (ktime_before(ktime_get(), timeout)); -- 2.13.4.dirty _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
