On 10/01/18 08:09, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
We'll need that name for a generic implementation soon.
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.mur...@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> --- arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c index f3a637b98487..6840426bbe77 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static int __swiotlb_dma_mapping_error(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t addr) return 0; }-static const struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = {+static const struct dma_map_ops arm64_swiotlb_dma_ops = { .alloc = __dma_alloc, .free = __dma_free, .mmap = __swiotlb_mmap, @@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64 dma_base, u64 size, const struct iommu_ops *iommu, bool coherent) { if (!dev->dma_ops) - dev->dma_ops = &swiotlb_dma_ops; + dev->dma_ops = &arm64_swiotlb_dma_ops;dev->archdata.dma_coherent = coherent;__iommu_setup_dma_ops(dev, dma_base, size, iommu);
_______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
