On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 17:35 +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 04:48:23PM +0000, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> > dmar_fault() reports/handles/cleans DMAR faults in a cycle one-by-
> > one.
> > The nuisance is that it's set as a irq handler and runs with
> > disabled
> > interrupts - which works OK if you have only a couple of DMAR
> > faults,
> > but becomes a problem if your intel iommu has a plenty of mappings.
> 
> I don't think that a work-queue is the right solution here, it adds a
> long delay until the log is processed. During that delay, and with
> high
> fault rates the error log will overflow during that delay.
> 
> Here is what I think you should do instead to fix the soft-lockups:
> 
> First, unmask the fault reporting irq so that you will get subsequent
> irqs. Then:
> 
>       * For Primary Fault Reporting just cycle once through all
>         supported fault recording registers.
> 
>       * For Advanced Fault Reporting, read start and end pointer of
>         the log and process all entries.
> 
> After that return from the fault handler and let the next irq handle
> additional faults that might have been recorded while the previous
> handler was running.

Ok, will re-do this way, thanks.

> And of course, ratelimiting the fault printouts is always a good
> idea.

-- 
            Dima
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to