2018-07-10 18:50 GMT+09:00 Michal Hocko <mho...@kernel.org>:
> On Tue 10-07-18 16:19:32, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> Hello, Marek.
>> 2018-07-09 21:19 GMT+09:00 Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprow...@samsung.com>:
>> > cma_alloc() function doesn't really support gfp flags other than
>> > __GFP_NOWARN, so convert gfp_mask parameter to boolean no_warn parameter.
>> Although gfp_mask isn't used in cma_alloc() except no_warn, it can be used
>> in alloc_contig_range(). For example, if passed gfp mask has no __GFP_FS,
>> compaction(isolation) would work differently. Do you have considered
>> such a case?
> Does any of cma_alloc users actually care about GFP_NO{FS,IO}?

I don't know. My guess is that cma_alloc() is used for DMA allocation so
block device would use it, too. If fs/block subsystem initiates the
request for the device,
it would be possible that cma_alloc() is called with such a flag.
Again, I don't know
much about those subsystem so I would be wrong.

iommu mailing list

Reply via email to