On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 03:40:22PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > Hi Alan, > > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:28:14AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > > On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > > > > > I did some more debugging. Tested with a KASAN enabled kernel and that > > > > shows the problem. The report is attached. > > > > > > > > To my understanding: > > > > > > > > btusb_work() is calling usb_set_interface() with alternate = 0. which > > > > again calls usb_hcd_alloc_bandwidth() and that frees the rings by > > > > xhci_free_endpoint_ring(). > > > > > > That doesn't sound like the right thing to do. The rings shouldn't be > > > freed until xhci_endpoint_disable() is called. > > > > > > On the other hand, there doesn't appear to be any > > > xhci_endpoint_disable() routine, although a comment refers to it. > > > Maybe this is the real problem? > > > > one of your old mail might help :) > > > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg98123.html
That message seems to say the same thing as what I just wrote, more or less. > Wrote too soon. > > Is it the one you are looking for - > usb_disable_endpoint() is in drivers/usb/core/message.c No, I'm talking about xhci_endpoint_disable(), which would be called by usb_hcd_disable_endpoint() if it existed. Of course, usb_hcd_disable_endpoint() is called by usb_disable_endpoint(). Alan Stern _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
