On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:16:07PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Whilst the notion of an upstream DMA restriction is most commonly seen
> in PCI host bridges saddled with a 32-bit native interface, a more
> general version of the same issue can exist on complex SoCs where a bus
> or point-to-point interconnect link from a device's DMA master interface
> to another component along the path to memory (often an IOMMU) may carry
> fewer address bits than the interfaces at both ends nominally support.
> In order to properly deal with this, the first step is to expand the
> dma_32bit_limit flag into an arbitrary mask.
> 
> To minimise the impact on existing code, we'll make sure to only
> consider this new mask valid if set. That makes sense anyway, since a
> mask of zero would represent DMA not being wired up at all, and that
> would be better handled by not providing valid ops in the first place.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.mur...@arm.com>

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to