On 24/08/18 12:38, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 24/08/18 07:53, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
We need to take the DMA offset and encryption bit into account when selecting
a zone.  Add a helper that takes those into account and use it.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
---
  kernel/dma/direct.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
index de87b0282e74..3f8b596ea393 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
@@ -58,6 +58,14 @@ static bool dma_coherent_ok(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys, size_t size)
      return addr + size - 1 <= dev->coherent_dma_mask;
  }
+static bool dma_coherent_below(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
+{
+    dma_addr_t addr = force_dma_unencrypted() ?
+        __phys_to_dma(dev, mask) : phys_to_dma(dev, mask);
+
+    return dev->coherent_dma_mask <= addr;
+}
+
  void *dma_direct_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle,
          gfp_t gfp, unsigned long attrs)
  {
@@ -70,9 +78,9 @@ void *dma_direct_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle,
      gfp &= ~__GFP_ZERO;
      /* GFP_DMA32 and GFP_DMA are no ops without the corresponding zones: */
-    if (dev->coherent_dma_mask <= DMA_BIT_MASK(ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS))
+    if (dma_coherent_below(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS)))
          gfp |= GFP_DMA;
-    if (dev->coherent_dma_mask <= DMA_BIT_MASK(32) && !(gfp & GFP_DMA))
+    if (dma_coherent_below(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32) && !(gfp & GFP_DMA)))
          gfp |= GFP_DMA32;
  again:
@@ -93,14 +101,14 @@ void *dma_direct_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle,
          page = NULL;
          if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32) &&
-            dev->coherent_dma_mask < DMA_BIT_MASK(64) &&

We're effectively changing the "<" into a "<="...

+            dma_coherent_below(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64)) &&

...which I think means this check now *always* returns true...

Although on closer inspection that was effectively already the case - we could never get here if dev->coherent_dma_mask == DMA_BIT_MASK(64), because dma_coherent_ok() couldn't possibly have returned false in the first place. So this one was always unnecessary.

Robin.
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to