On 19/08/2018 08:51, Zhen Lei wrote:
More than two CMD_SYNCs maybe adjacent in the command queue, and the first
one has done what others want to do. Drop the redundant CMD_SYNCs can
improve IO performance especially under the pressure scene.

I did the statistics in my test environment, the number of CMD_SYNCs can
be reduced about 1/3. See below:
CMD_SYNCs reduced:      19542181
CMD_SYNCs total:        58098548        (include reduced)
CMDs total:             116197099       (TLBI:SYNC about 1:1)

Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index ac6d6df..f3a56e1 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -567,6 +567,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_device {
        int                             gerr_irq;
        int                             combined_irq;
        u32                             sync_nr;
+       u8                              prev_cmd_opcode;

        unsigned long                   ias; /* IPA */
        unsigned long                   oas; /* PA */
@@ -786,6 +787,11 @@ void arm_smmu_cmdq_build_sync_msi_cmd(u64 *cmd, struct 
arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent)
        cmd[1]  = ent->sync.msiaddr & CMDQ_SYNC_1_MSIADDR_MASK;
 }

+static inline u8 arm_smmu_cmd_opcode_get(u64 *cmd)
+{
+       return cmd[0] & CMDQ_0_OP;
+}
+
 /* High-level queue accessors */
 static int arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(u64 *cmd, struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent)
 {
@@ -906,6 +912,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_cmdq_insert_cmd(struct arm_smmu_device 
*smmu, u64 *cmd)
        struct arm_smmu_queue *q = &smmu->cmdq.q;
        bool wfe = !!(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_SEV);

+       smmu->prev_cmd_opcode = arm_smmu_cmd_opcode_get(cmd);
+
        while (queue_insert_raw(q, cmd) == -ENOSPC) {
                if (queue_poll_cons(q, false, wfe))
                        dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev, "CMDQ timeout\n");
@@ -958,9 +966,17 @@ static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_sync_msi(struct 
arm_smmu_device *smmu)
        };

        spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu->cmdq.lock, flags);
-       ent.sync.msidata = ++smmu->sync_nr;
-       arm_smmu_cmdq_build_sync_msi_cmd(cmd, &ent);
-       arm_smmu_cmdq_insert_cmd(smmu, cmd);
+       if (smmu->prev_cmd_opcode == CMDQ_OP_CMD_SYNC) {
+               /*
+                * Previous command is CMD_SYNC also, there is no need to add
+                * one more. Just poll it.
+                */
+               ent.sync.msidata = smmu->sync_nr;
+       } else {
+               ent.sync.msidata = ++smmu->sync_nr;
+               arm_smmu_cmdq_build_sync_msi_cmd(cmd, &ent);
+               arm_smmu_cmdq_insert_cmd(smmu, cmd);
+       }
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smmu->cmdq.lock, flags);

I find something like this adds support for combining CMD_SYNC commands for regular polling mode:

@@ -569,6 +569,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_device {
        int                             combined_irq;
        u32                             sync_nr;
        u8                              prev_cmd_opcode;
+       int                             prev_cmd_sync_res;

        unsigned long                   ias; /* IPA */
        unsigned long                   oas; /* PA */
@@ -985,17 +986,33 @@ static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_sync_msi(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)

 static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
 {
-       u64 cmd[CMDQ_ENT_DWORDS];
+       static u64 cmd[CMDQ_ENT_DWORDS] = {
+               _FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_0_OP, CMDQ_OP_CMD_SYNC) |
+               _FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS, CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_SEV) |
+               _FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_SYNC_0_MSH, ARM_SMMU_SH_ISH) |
+               _FIELD_PREP(CMDQ_SYNC_0_MSIATTR, ARM_SMMU_MEMATTR_OIWB)
+       };
        unsigned long flags;
        bool wfe = !!(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_SEV);
-       struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent ent = { .opcode = CMDQ_OP_CMD_SYNC };
-       int ret;
+       int ret = 0;

-       arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(cmd, &ent);

        spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu->cmdq.lock, flags);
-       arm_smmu_cmdq_insert_cmd(smmu, cmd);
-       ret = queue_poll_cons(&smmu->cmdq.q, true, wfe);
+       if (smmu->prev_cmd_opcode != CMDQ_OP_CMD_SYNC ||
+               smmu->prev_cmd_sync_res != 0) {
+               arm_smmu_cmdq_insert_cmd(smmu, cmd);
+               smmu->prev_cmd_sync_res = ret =
+                       queue_poll_cons(&smmu->cmdq.q, true, wfe);
+       }

I tested iperf on a 1G network link and was seeing 6-10% CMD_SYNC commands combined. I would really need to test this on a faster connection to see any throughout difference.

From the above figures, I think leizhen was seeing 25% combine rate, right?

As for this code, it could be neatened...

Cheers,
John


        return __arm_smmu_sync_poll_msi(smmu, ent.sync.msidata);
--
1.8.3



.



_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to