CC linux-renesas-soc
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 5:01 PM jun qian <[email protected]> wrote: > > As you are already in ISR, it is unnecessary to call spin_lock_irqsave. > > Signed-off-by: jun qian <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c > index 22b94f8a9a04..afa23d53502c 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c > @@ -569,9 +569,8 @@ static irqreturn_t ipmmu_irq(int irq, void *dev) > struct ipmmu_vmsa_device *mmu = dev; > irqreturn_t status = IRQ_NONE; > unsigned int i; > - unsigned long flags; > > - spin_lock_irqsave(&mmu->lock, flags); > + spin_lock(&mmu->lock); > > /* > * Check interrupts for all active contexts. > @@ -583,7 +582,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ipmmu_irq(int irq, void *dev) > status = IRQ_HANDLED; > } > > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mmu->lock, flags); > + spin_unlock(&mmu->lock); > > return status; > } > -- > 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
