On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 10:09 PM Will Deacon <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 02:09:34PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 11:55:47AM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > > Vivek Gautam (4):
> > >   firmware: qcom_scm-64: Add atomic version of qcom_scm_call
> > >   firmware/qcom_scm: Add atomic version of io read/write APIs
> > >   firmware/qcom_scm: Add scm call to handle smmu errata
> > >   iommu/arm-smmu: Add support to handle Qcom's TLBI serialization errata
> > >
> > >  drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-32.c |  17 ++++
> > >  drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c | 181 
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > >  drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c    |  18 ++++
> > >  drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.h    |   9 ++
> > >  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-regs.h  |   2 +
> > >  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c       | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  include/linux/qcom_scm.h       |   6 ++
> > >  7 files changed, 320 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> >
> > Should this go through the iommu-tree? In that case I need Acked-by's
> > for the firmware code changes.
>
> Yup, and I'd also like Robin's ack on the arm-smmu*.c changes (I see he has
> some comments on the code as it stands).

Thanks Joerg, and Will for taking a look at it. I will answer and
address Robin's comments
for smmu part.

Best regards
Vivek

>
> Will
> _______________________________________________
> iommu mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu



-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to