On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 06:52:51PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: >> scatterlist *sgl, >> - int nelems, enum dma_data_direction dir, >> - unsigned long attrs) >> +long arch_dma_coherent_to_pfn(struct device *dev, void *cpu_addr, > > I realise I'm spotting this a bit late, but does this interface really need > somewhat-atypical signed PFNs?
It has been a while since I wrote this code, and I can't remember the reason for it except that I'm pretty sure I copy and pasted it from existing code somewhere. Switching it to unsigned long should be fine, and patches are welcome. >> +static int __swiotlb_get_sgtable_page(struct sg_table *sgt, >> + struct page *page, size_t size) > > If __iommu_get_sgtable() is now the only user, I'd say just inline these > remnants there (or let that case call dma_common_sgtable() if that's what > swiotlb_dma_ops are now relying on). Either way the "__swiotlb" is now a > complete misnomer. It is. But we hopefully kill both the only user and this helper in the 4.21 merge window when moving the iommu dma api wrappers to common code. _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
