Since there are multiple possible failures in iommu_map_page
it would be useful to know which case is being hit when the
error message is printed in map_sg. While here, fix up checkpatch
complaint about using function name in a string instead of
__func__.

Cc: Joerg Roedel <j...@8bytes.org>
Signed-off-by: Jerry Snitselaar <jsnit...@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
index 87ba23a75b38..675f7027aa04 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
@@ -2562,6 +2562,7 @@ static int map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist 
*sglist,
        struct scatterlist *s;
        unsigned long address;
        u64 dma_mask;
+       int ret;
 
        domain = get_domain(dev);
        if (IS_ERR(domain))
@@ -2584,7 +2585,6 @@ static int map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist 
*sglist,
 
                for (j = 0; j < pages; ++j) {
                        unsigned long bus_addr, phys_addr;
-                       int ret;
 
                        bus_addr  = address + s->dma_address + (j << 
PAGE_SHIFT);
                        phys_addr = (sg_phys(s) & PAGE_MASK) + (j << 
PAGE_SHIFT);
@@ -2605,8 +2605,8 @@ static int map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist 
*sglist,
        return nelems;
 
 out_unmap:
-       pr_err("%s: IOMMU mapping error in map_sg (io-pages: %d)\n",
-              dev_name(dev), npages);
+       pr_err("%s: IOMMU mapping error in %s (io-pages: %d) reason: %d\n",
+              dev_name(dev), __func__, npages, ret);
 
        for_each_sg(sglist, s, nelems, i) {
                int j, pages = iommu_num_pages(sg_phys(s), s->length, 
PAGE_SIZE);
-- 
2.20.1.98.gecbdaf0899

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to