Hi Alex,
On 3/22/19 12:01 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Mar 2019 18:22:19 +0100
> Eric Auger <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> This patch adds the VFIO_IOMMU_BIND/UNBIND_MSI ioctl which aim
>> to pass/withdraw the guest MSI binding to/from the host.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <[email protected]>
>>
>> ---
>> v3 -> v4:
>> - add UNBIND
>> - unwind on BIND error
>>
>> v2 -> v3:
>> - adapt to new proto of bind_guest_msi
>> - directly use vfio_iommu_for_each_dev
>>
>> v1 -> v2:
>> - s/vfio_iommu_type1_guest_msi_binding/vfio_iommu_type1_bind_guest_msi
>> ---
>> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> index 12a40b9db6aa..66513679081b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>> @@ -1710,6 +1710,25 @@ static int vfio_cache_inv_fn(struct device *dev, void
>> *data)
>> return iommu_cache_invalidate(d, dev, &ustruct->info);
>> }
>>
>> +static int vfio_bind_msi_fn(struct device *dev, void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_bind_msi *ustruct =
>> + (struct vfio_iommu_type1_bind_msi *)data;
>> + struct iommu_domain *d = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev);
>> +
>> + return iommu_bind_guest_msi(d, dev, ustruct->iova,
>> + ustruct->gpa, ustruct->size);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int vfio_unbind_msi_fn(struct device *dev, void *data)
>> +{
>> + dma_addr_t *iova = (dma_addr_t *)data;
>> + struct iommu_domain *d = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev);
>
> Same as previous, we can encapsulate domain in our own struct to avoid
> a lookup.
>
>> +
>> + iommu_unbind_guest_msi(d, dev, *iova);
>
> Is it strange that iommu-core is exposing these interfaces at a device
> level if every one of them requires us to walk all the devices? Thanks,
Hum this per device API was devised in response of Robin's comments on
[RFC v2 12/20] dma-iommu: Implement NESTED_MSI cookie.
"
But that then seems to reveal a somewhat bigger problem - if the callers
are simply registering IPAs, and relying on the ITS driver to grab an
entry and fill in a PA later, then how does either one know *which* PA
is supposed to belong to a given IPA in the case where you have multiple
devices with different ITS targets assigned to the same guest? (and if
it's possible to assume a guest will use per-device stage 1 mappings and
present it with a single vITS backed by multiple pITSes, I think things
start breaking even harder.)
"
However looking back into the problem I wonder if there was an issue
with the iommu_domain based API.
If my understanding is correct, when assigned devices are protected by a
vIOMMU then they necessarily end up in separate host iommu domains even
if they belong to the same iommu_domain on the guest. And there can only
be a single device in this iommu_domain.
If this is confirmed, there is a non ambiguous association between 1
physical iommu_domain, 1 device, 1 S1 mapping and 1 physical MSI
controller.
I added the device handle handle to disambiguate those associations. The
gIOVA ->gDB mapping is associated with a device handle. Then when the
host needs a stage 1 mapping for this device, to build the nested
mapping towards the physical DB it can easily grab the gIOVA->gDB stage
1 mapping registered for this device.
The correctness looks more obvious to me, at least.
Thanks
Eric
>
> Alex
>
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>> unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>> {
>> @@ -1814,6 +1833,45 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>> vfio_cache_inv_fn);
>> mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>> return ret;
>> + } else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_MSI) {
>> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_bind_msi ustruct;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_bind_msi,
>> + size);
>> +
>> + if (copy_from_user(&ustruct, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> +
>> + if (ustruct.argsz < minsz || ustruct.flags)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
>> + ret = vfio_iommu_for_each_dev(iommu, &ustruct,
>> + vfio_bind_msi_fn);
>> + if (ret)
>> + vfio_iommu_for_each_dev(iommu, &ustruct.iova,
>> + vfio_unbind_msi_fn);
>> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>> + return ret;
>> + } else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_UNBIND_MSI) {
>> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_unbind_msi ustruct;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_unbind_msi,
>> + iova);
>> +
>> + if (copy_from_user(&ustruct, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> +
>> + if (ustruct.argsz < minsz || ustruct.flags)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
>> + ret = vfio_iommu_for_each_dev(iommu, &ustruct.iova,
>> + vfio_unbind_msi_fn);
>> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> return -ENOTTY;
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>> index 29f0ef2d805d..6763389b6adc 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>> @@ -789,6 +789,35 @@ struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate {
>> };
>> #define VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 24)
>>
>> +/**
>> + * VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_MSI - _IOWR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 25,
>> + * struct vfio_iommu_type1_bind_msi)
>> + *
>> + * Pass a stage 1 MSI doorbell mapping to the host so that this
>> + * latter can build a nested stage2 mapping
>> + */
>> +struct vfio_iommu_type1_bind_msi {
>> + __u32 argsz;
>> + __u32 flags;
>> + __u64 iova;
>> + __u64 gpa;
>> + __u64 size;
>> +};
>> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_MSI _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 25)
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * VFIO_IOMMU_UNBIND_MSI - _IOWR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 26,
>> + * struct vfio_iommu_type1_unbind_msi)
>> + *
>> + * Unregister an MSI mapping
>> + */
>> +struct vfio_iommu_type1_unbind_msi {
>> + __u32 argsz;
>> + __u32 flags;
>> + __u64 iova;
>> +};
>> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_UNBIND_MSI _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 26)
>> +
>> /* -------- Additional API for SPAPR TCE (Server POWERPC) IOMMU -------- */
>>
>> /*
>
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
