Hi Julien,

On 4/29/19 4:44 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> A recent change split iommu_dma_map_msi_msg() in two new functions. The
> function was still implemented to avoid modifying all the callers at
> once.
> 
> Now that all the callers have been reworked, iommu_dma_map_msi_msg() can
> be removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <[email protected]>

Thanks

Eric
> 
> ---
>     Changes in v2:
>         - Rework the commit message
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 20 --------------------
>  include/linux/dma-iommu.h |  5 -----
>  2 files changed, 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> index 2309f59cefa4..12f4464828a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> @@ -936,23 +936,3 @@ void iommu_dma_compose_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *desc,
>       msg->address_lo &= cookie_msi_granule(domain->iova_cookie) - 1;
>       msg->address_lo += lower_32_bits(msi_page->iova);
>  }
> -
> -void iommu_dma_map_msi_msg(int irq, struct msi_msg *msg)
> -{
> -     struct msi_desc *desc = irq_get_msi_desc(irq);
> -     phys_addr_t msi_addr = (u64)msg->address_hi << 32 | msg->address_lo;
> -
> -     if (WARN_ON(iommu_dma_prepare_msi(desc, msi_addr))) {
> -             /*
> -              * We're called from a void callback, so the best we can do is
> -              * 'fail' by filling the message with obviously bogus values.
> -              * Since we got this far due to an IOMMU being present, it's
> -              * not like the existing address would have worked anyway...
> -              */
> -             msg->address_hi = ~0U;
> -             msg->address_lo = ~0U;
> -             msg->data = ~0U;
> -     } else {
> -             iommu_dma_compose_msi_msg(desc, msg);
> -     }
> -}
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-iommu.h b/include/linux/dma-iommu.h
> index 3fc48fbd6f63..ddd217c197df 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-iommu.h
> @@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ int iommu_dma_prepare_msi(struct msi_desc *desc, 
> phys_addr_t msi_addr);
>  void iommu_dma_compose_msi_msg(struct msi_desc *desc,
>                              struct msi_msg *msg);
>  
> -void iommu_dma_map_msi_msg(int irq, struct msi_msg *msg);
>  void iommu_dma_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct list_head *list);
>  
>  #else
> @@ -122,10 +121,6 @@ static inline void iommu_dma_compose_msi_msg(struct 
> msi_desc *desc,
>  {
>  }
>  
> -static inline void iommu_dma_map_msi_msg(int irq, struct msi_msg *msg)
> -{
> -}
> -
>  static inline void iommu_dma_get_resv_regions(struct device *dev, struct 
> list_head *list)
>  {
>  }
> 
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to