Hi, On 5/4/19 9:23 PM, Tom Murphy via iommu wrote:
@@ -4181,58 +4168,37 @@ static int intel_iommu_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, void *v) { struct memory_notify *mhp = v; - unsigned long long start, end; - unsigned long start_vpfn, last_vpfn; + unsigned long start_vpfn = mm_to_dma_pfn(mhp->start_pfn); + unsigned long last_vpfn = mm_to_dma_pfn(mhp->start_pfn + + mhp->nr_pages - 1);switch (val) {case MEM_GOING_ONLINE: - start = mhp->start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT; - end = ((mhp->start_pfn + mhp->nr_pages) << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1; - if (iommu_domain_identity_map(si_domain, start, end)) { - pr_warn("Failed to build identity map for [%llx-%llx]\n", - start, end); + if (iommu_domain_identity_map(si_domain, start_vpfn, + last_vpfn)) { + pr_warn("Failed to build identity map for [%lx-%lx]\n", + start_vpfn, last_vpfn); return NOTIFY_BAD; } break;
Actually we don't need to update the si_domain if iommu hardware supports pass-through mode. This should be made in a separated patch anyway. Best regards, Lu Baolu _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
