From: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>

Apparently, some Qualcomm arm64 platforms which appear to expose their
SMMU global register space are still, in fact, using a hypervisor to
mediate it by trapping and emulating register accesses. Sadly, some
deployed versions of said trapping code have bugs wherein they go
horribly wrong for stores using r31 (i.e. XZR/WZR) as the source
register.

While this can be mitigated for GCC today by tweaking the constraints
for the implementation of writel_relaxed(), to avoid any potential
arms race with future compilers more aggressively optimising register
allocation, the simple way is to just remove all the problematic
constant zeros. For the write-only TLB operations, the actual value is
irrelevant anyway and any old nearby variable will provide a suitable
GPR to encode. The one point at which we really do need a zero to clear
a context bank happens before any of the TLB maintenance where crashes
have been reported, so is apparently not a problem... :/

Reported-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Marc Gonzalez <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
Tested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Marc Gonzalez <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Bjorn Andersson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]>
---
Changes from v1:
- Tweak commit message (remove "compilers", s/hangs/crashes)
- Add a comment before writel_relaxed
---
 drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
index 5e54cc0a28b3..3f352268fa8b 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -423,7 +423,8 @@ static void __arm_smmu_tlb_sync(struct arm_smmu_device 
*smmu,
 {
        unsigned int spin_cnt, delay;
 
-       writel_relaxed(0, sync);
+       /* Write "garbage" (rather than 0) to work around a qcom bug */
+       writel_relaxed((unsigned long)sync, sync);
        for (delay = 1; delay < TLB_LOOP_TIMEOUT; delay *= 2) {
                for (spin_cnt = TLB_SPIN_COUNT; spin_cnt > 0; spin_cnt--) {
                        if (!(readl_relaxed(status) & sTLBGSTATUS_GSACTIVE))
@@ -1763,8 +1764,9 @@ static void arm_smmu_device_reset(struct arm_smmu_device 
*smmu)
        }
 
        /* Invalidate the TLB, just in case */
-       writel_relaxed(0, gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_TLBIALLH);
-       writel_relaxed(0, gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_TLBIALLNSNH);
+       /* Write "garbage" (rather than 0) to work around a qcom bug */
+       writel_relaxed(reg, gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_TLBIALLH);
+       writel_relaxed(reg, gr0_base + ARM_SMMU_GR0_TLBIALLNSNH);
 
        reg = readl_relaxed(ARM_SMMU_GR0_NS(smmu) + ARM_SMMU_GR0_sCR0);
 
-- 
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to