Hi,
On 8/16/19 12:46 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:45:13AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
Okay. I understand that adding these APIs in iommu.c is not a good idea.
And, I also don't think merging the bounce buffer implementation into
iommu_map() is feasible since iommu_map() is not DMA API centric.
The bounce buffer implementation will eventually be part of DMA APIs
defined in dma-iommu.c, but currently those APIs are not ready for x86
use yet. So I will put them in iommu/vt-d driver for this time being and
will move them to dma-iommu.c later.
I think they are more or less ready actually, we just need more people
reviewing the conversions. Tom just reposted the AMD one which will need
a few more reviews, and he has an older patchset for intel-iommu as well
that could use a some more eyes.
Good progress and thanks for the update. I prefer that we merge this
patch series first since it addresses the real thunderbolt
vulnerability.
Best regards,
Lu Baolu
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
