Hi Bjorn,
hi Stephen,

Am 20.08.19 um 07:43 schrieb Stefan Wahren:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> Am 20.08.19 um 03:24 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
>> Hi Stefan,
>>
>> please try the patch below.
>>
>> ---
>> From e0570628d96faa50ebfc94ce8e545968336db225 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
>> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:08:38 +0900
>> Subject: arm: select the dma-noncoherent symbols for all swiotlb builds
>>
>> We need to provide the arch hooks for non-coherent dma-direct
>> and swiotlb for all swiotlb builds, not just when LPAS is enabled.
> s/LPAS/LPAE/
>> Without that the Xen build that selects SWIOTLB indirectly through
>> SWIOTLB_XEN fails to build.
>>
>> Fixes: ad3c7b18c5b3 ("arm: use swiotlb for bounce buffering on LPAE configs")
>> Reported-by: Stefan Wahren <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> i applied this patch and it fixes the build issue i reported before. But
> this seems to reveal another build issue in drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c:
>
> drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c: In function ‘qcom_scm_assign_mem’:
> drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c:460:47: error: passing argument 3 of
> ‘dma_alloc_coherent’ from incompatible pointer type
> [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
>   ptr = dma_alloc_coherent(__scm->dev, ptr_sz, &ptr_phys, GFP_KERNEL);
>                                                ^
> In file included from drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c:12:0:
> ./include/linux/dma-mapping.h:636:21: note: expected ‘dma_addr_t * {aka
> long long unsigned int *}’ but argument is of type ‘phys_addr_t * {aka
> unsigned int *}’
>  static inline void *dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> scripts/Makefile.build:280: die Regel für Ziel
> „drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.o“ scheiterte
>
> Luckily there is already a patch to fix this in linux-next:
>
> firmware: qcom_scm: Use proper types for dma mappings
could you please take care that this patch is applied to 5.3-fixes?
>
> It seems that it misses the fixes tag.
>
> Regards
> Stefan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to