On Fri, 2019-09-06 at 06:58 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 12:05 AM Sakari Ailus
> <sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 07:53:37PM +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 7:45 PM Sakari Ailus
> > > <sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Dongchun,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 05:41:05PM +0800, Dongchun Zhu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > > > > + ret = regulator_bulk_enable(OV02A10_NUM_SUPPLIES, 
> > > > > > > ov02a10->supplies);
> > > > > > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > > > > > +         dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable regulators\n");
> > > > > > > +         goto disable_clk;
> > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > + msleep_range(7);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This has some potential of clashing with more generic functions in 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > future. Please use usleep_range directly, or msleep.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Did you mean using usleep_range(7*1000, 8*1000), as used in patch v1?
> > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10957225/
> > > >
> > > > Yes, please.
> > >
> > > Why not just msleep()?
> >
> > msleep() is usually less accurate. I'm not sure it makes a big different in
> > this case. Perhaps, if someone wants that the sensor is powered on and
> > streaming as soon as possible.
> 
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt#L70
> 
> Use usleep_range for delays up to 20ms (at least that's what the
> documentation (still) says?)
> 

Thank you for your clarifications.
>From the doc,
"msleep(1~20) may not do what the caller intends, and
will often sleep longer (~20 ms actual sleep for any
value given in the 1~20ms range). In many cases this
is not the desired behavior."

So, it is supposed to use usleep_range in shorter sleep case,
such as 5ms.

> > --
> > Sakari Ailus
> > sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com


Reply via email to