On 2019-10-09 12:57 a.m., Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 04:18:35PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>> From: Kit Chow <[email protected]>
>>
>> Currently the Intel IOMMU uses the default dma_[un]map_resource()
>
> s/Intel/AMD/ ?
Oops, yes, my mistake.
>> +static dma_addr_t map_resource(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr,
>> + size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
>> +{
>> + struct protection_domain *domain;
>> + struct dma_ops_domain *dma_dom;
>> +
>> + domain = get_domain(dev);
>> + if (PTR_ERR(domain) == -EINVAL)
>> + return (dma_addr_t)paddr;
>
> I thought that case can't happen anymore?
>
> Also note that Joerg just applied the patch to convert the AMD iommu
> driver to use the dma-iommu ops. Can you test that series and check
> it does the right thing for your use case? From looking at the code
> I think it should.
Yes, looking at the new code, it looks like this patch will not be
needed. So we can drop it. We'll test it to make sure.
I believe the other two patches in this series are still needed though.
Thanks,
Logan
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
