On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 13:37:10 -0800
Joe Perches <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-11-21 at 13:26 -0800, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > Use combined macros for_each_svm_dev() to simplify SVM device
> > iteration and error checking.
> []
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
> []
> > +#define for_each_svm_dev(sdev, svm, d) \
> > + list_for_each_entry((sdev), &(svm)->devs, list) \
> > + if ((d) != (sdev)->dev) {} else
> > +
> > int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct device *dev, int *pasid, int flags,
> > struct svm_dev_ops *ops) {
> > struct intel_iommu *iommu = intel_svm_device_to_iommu(dev);
> > @@ -274,15 +278,13 @@ int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct device *dev, int
> > *pasid, int flags, struct svm_dev_ goto out;
> > }
> >
> > - list_for_each_entry(sdev, &svm->devs,
> > list) {
> > - if (dev == sdev->dev) {
> > - if (sdev->ops != ops) {
> > - ret = -EBUSY;
> > - goto out;
> > - }
> > - sdev->users++;
> > - goto success;
> > + for_each_svm_dev(sdev, svm, dev) {
> > + if (sdev->ops != ops) {
> > + ret = -EBUSY;
> > + goto out;
> > }
> > + sdev->users++;
> > + goto success;
> > }
>
> I think this does not read better as this is now a
> for_each loop that exits the loop on the first match.
>
I think one of the benefits is reduced indentation. What do you
recommend?
> >
> > break;
> > @@ -427,43 +429,36 @@ int intel_svm_unbind_mm(struct device *dev,
> > int pasid) goto out;
> > }
> >
> > - if (!svm)
> > - goto out;
> > -
> > - list_for_each_entry(sdev, &svm->devs, list) {
> []
> > + for_each_svm_dev(sdev, svm, dev) {
>
> I think this should not remove the !svm test above.
>
Yeah, !svm test should have been part of 6/8. I will fix that.
Thanks,
Jacob
>
[Jacob Pan]
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
