Hi Jim,
On 1/5/20 12:52 AM, Roland Dreier wrote:
Jim proposed another solution.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/12/23/653
Does this work for you?
Yes, that's OK for the cases I've seen too. All the NTB devices I've
seen are PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_OTHER with type 0 headers, so this patch
would not break anything. And I think the idea of allowing DMAR
bridge scope for all devices with PCI class bridge is logical - BIOS
writers probably are going by PCI class rather than header type when
assigning scope.
Can you please post a v2 of this patch with the change you proposed in
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/12/23/653?
Best regards,
baolu
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
