On Wed 22 Jan 03:48 PST 2020, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:

> Currently the QCOM specific smmu reset implementation is very
> specific to SDM845 SoC and has a wait-for-safe logic which
> may not be required for other SoCs. So move the SDM845 specific
> logic to its specific reset function. Also add SC7180 SMMU
> compatible for calling into QCOM specific implementation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ran...@codeaurora.org>

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.anders...@linaro.org>

Regards,
Bjorn

> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-impl.c |  8 +++++---
>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-impl.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-impl.c
> index 74d97a886e93..c75b9d957b70 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-impl.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-impl.c
> @@ -150,6 +150,8 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl arm_mmu500_impl = {
>  
>  struct arm_smmu_device *arm_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>  {
> +     const struct device_node *np = smmu->dev->of_node;
> +
>       /*
>        * We will inevitably have to combine model-specific implementation
>        * quirks with platform-specific integration quirks, but everything
> @@ -166,11 +168,11 @@ struct arm_smmu_device *arm_smmu_impl_init(struct 
> arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>               break;
>       }
>  
> -     if (of_property_read_bool(smmu->dev->of_node,
> -                               "calxeda,smmu-secure-config-access"))
> +     if (of_property_read_bool(np, "calxeda,smmu-secure-config-access"))
>               smmu->impl = &calxeda_impl;
>  
> -     if (of_device_is_compatible(smmu->dev->of_node, "qcom,sdm845-smmu-500"))
> +     if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,sdm845-smmu-500") ||
> +         of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,sc7180-smmu-500"))
>               return qcom_smmu_impl_init(smmu);
>  
>       return smmu;
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> index 24c071c1d8b0..64a4ab270ab7 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> @@ -15,8 +15,6 @@ static int qcom_sdm845_smmu500_reset(struct arm_smmu_device 
> *smmu)
>  {
>       int ret;
>  
> -     arm_mmu500_reset(smmu);
> -
>       /*
>        * To address performance degradation in non-real time clients,
>        * such as USB and UFS, turn off wait-for-safe on sdm845 based boards,
> @@ -30,8 +28,20 @@ static int qcom_sdm845_smmu500_reset(struct 
> arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int qcom_smmu500_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> +     const struct device_node *np = smmu->dev->of_node;
> +
> +     arm_mmu500_reset(smmu);
> +
> +     if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,sdm845-smmu-500"))
> +             return qcom_sdm845_smmu500_reset(smmu);
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_smmu_impl = {
> -     .reset = qcom_sdm845_smmu500_reset,
> +     .reset = qcom_smmu500_reset,
>  };
>  
>  struct arm_smmu_device *qcom_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> -- 
> QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
> of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to