Hi Jon,

Thanks for picking this up. Apologies for my absence here - I wasn't
able to work on this recently, but I'm back again now.

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 3:32 AM Jon Derrick <jonathan.derr...@intel.com> wrote:
> This becomes problematic if the real DMA device and the subdevices have
> different addressing capabilities and some require translation. Instead we can
> put the real DMA dev and any subdevices on the DMA domain. This change assigns
> subdevices to the DMA domain, and moves the real DMA device to the DMA domain
> if necessary.

Have you tested this with the real DMA device in identity mode?
It is not quite working for me. (Again, I'm not using VMD here, but
have looked closely and believe we're working under the same
constraints)

First, the real DMA device gets added to the group:
 pci 0000:00:17.0: Adding to iommu group 9
(it's in IDENTITY mode here)

Then later, the first subdevice comes along, and these are the results:
 pci 10000:00:00.0: [8086:02d7] type 00 class 0x010601
 pci 10000:00:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0xae1a0000-0xae1a7fff]
 pci 10000:00:00.0: reg 0x14: [mem 0xae1a8000-0xae1a80ff]
 pci 10000:00:00.0: reg 0x18: [io  0x3090-0x3097]
 pci 10000:00:00.0: reg 0x1c: [io  0x3080-0x3083]
 pci 10000:00:00.0: reg 0x20: [io  0x3060-0x307f]
 pci 10000:00:00.0: reg 0x24: [mem 0xae100000-0xae103fff]
 pci 10000:00:00.0: PME# supported from D3hot
 pci 10000:00:00.0: Adding to iommu group 9
 pci 10000:00:00.0: DMAR: Failed to get a private domain.

That final message is added by your patch and indicates that it's not working.

This is because the subdevice got added to the iommu group before the
code you added tried to change to the DMA domain.

It first gets added to the group through this call path:
    intel_iommu_add_device
-> iommu_group_get_for_dev
-> iommu_group_add_device

Then, continuing within intel_iommu_add_device we get to the code you
added, which tries to move the real DMA dev to DMA mode instead. It
calls:

   intel_iommu_request_dma_domain_for_dev
-> iommu_request_dma_domain_for_dev
-> request_default_domain_for_dev

Which fails here:
    /* Don't change mappings of existing devices */
    ret = -EBUSY;
    if (iommu_group_device_count(group) != 1)
        goto out;

because we already have 2 devices in the group (the real DMA dev, plus
the subdevice we're in the process of handling now).

Next I'll look into the iommu group rework that Baolu mentioned.

Thanks,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to