On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 09:42:41PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> So, this is still not enough that would still trigger storage driver offline 
> under
> memory pressure for a bit longer. It looks to me that in fetch_pte() there are
> could still racy?

Yes, your patch still looks racy. You need to atomically read
domain->pt_root to a stack variable and derive the pt_root pointer and
the mode from that variable instead of domain->pt_root directly. If you
read the domain->pt_root twice there could still be an update between
the two reads.
Probably the lock in increase_address_space() can also be avoided if
pt_root is updated using cmpxchg()?

Regards,

        Joerg

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Reply via email to